Having a disagreement: expression, persuasion and demand
نویسندگان
چکیده
Abstract It is common to distinguish between disagreement in the state sense (being disagreement) and activity (having a disagreement). This paper deals with question of what it for two people have disagreement. First, I present reject thesis according which having matter expressing conflicting attitudes. argue that this not sufficient disagreement: can express attitudes without Second, involves only expression attitudes, but also persuasive attempt bring other around one’s view. necessary trying change each other’s minds. Finally, put forward an alternative account goes beyond mere does go as far posit someone’s mind. Having disagreement, submit, demanding agreement, is, advancing normative claim should share attitude.
منابع مشابه
a comparative pragmatic analysis of the speech act of “disagreement” across english and persian
the speech act of disagreement has been one of the speech acts that has received the least attention in the field of pragmatics. this study investigates the ways power relations, social distance, formality of the context, gender, and language proficiency (for efl learners) influence disagreement and politeness strategies. the participants of the study were 200 male and female native persian s...
15 صفحه اولEmotional disagreement The role of semantic content in the expression of, and disagreement over, emotional values
The role of semantic content in the expression of, and disagreement over, emotional values Isidora Stojanovic, Institut Jean-Nicod – CNRS – ENS – EHESS Abstract When we describe an event as sad or happy, we attribute to it a certain emotional value. Attributions of emotional value depend essentially on an agent (and on his or her emotional responses); and yet, people readily disagree over such ...
متن کاملCorrespondence: A Cyber Disagreement
Policymakers and pundits have been sounding alarms about internet insecurity for years, so the arst appearance of anything in International Security (IS) on this topic is a welcomed development. In the fall 2013 issue, Lucas Kello takes the security studies community to task for ignoring cyber perils, while Erik Gartzke argues that cyberwar is of limited political utility.1 Kello writes that “[...
متن کاملSustaining a Rational Disagreement
Much recent discussion in social epistemology has focussed on the question of whether peers can rationally sustain a disagreement. A growing number of social epistemologists hold that the answer is negative. We point to considerations from the history of science that favor rather the opposite answer. However, we also explain how the other position can appear intuitively attractive. Disagreement...
متن کاملDisagreement and Information Collection
This note shows that disagreement, in the sense of differing priors, may increase the incentives to collect information when two agents work on a joint project. The reason is that each agent believes that new data will confirm his own beliefs and thus ‘convince’ the other agents to do what the focal agent thinks is right.
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Synthese
سال: 2022
ISSN: ['0039-7857', '1573-0964']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-022-03509-0